Opposition： It is natural and obligatory for parents to love their children； It is also an obligation for children to respect their parents and do housework for them. Obligations should be free of charge. How can you repay the debt you owe your parents if your partner has to withdraw pocket money to do housework？ How to fulfill family obligations？ The Right Way： Cultivate Economic Consciousness.
The opposite side： Paid housework will lead to a shift from \"economic awareness\" to \"money awareness\". Children develop a selfish mentality of \"money only\". They will form the wrong values of \"doing with money， not giving money or not doing with less money\" in the paid housework， and the negative effect of this value will certainly affect the formation of children's quality. Ruler： Money can increase enthusiasm for work.
The opposite： There is a fundamental purposeful mistake in using money to increase enthusiasm for labor. We do not work for money， but for our own work， for better ideals， and for a happy life. The mistake of the purpose leads to the violation of the original intention， which is very easy to form a bad atmosphere.
Square： More work， more work， less work.
The opposite side： First of all， the other side argued that the place was improper， and that children should be educated to \"know how to obtain benefits through labor\" and should be placed in other places. It is not the place of home. No matter how big the home is， it cannot be compared with the society. After all， home is linked by blood and emotion. The society needs money to survive， and in the family， more people are living. In addition， it needs to be emphasized that before educating children to \"earn benefits through labor\"， the current education is not \"there must be rewards after labor\". There are many things that can not be measured by money， such as kinship and family justice： which is more beneficial to ask parents for money or work in exchange for money.
The opposite side： It is not advisable to ask parents for money. On the one hand， it is a kind of performance of getting money without work. It is indeed better to exchange labor for money unilaterally than to ask parents for money directly， but it also brings various problems. When children do housework to pay for it， it may also make them become haggard and profit oriented. In the long run， children's \"money awareness\" will outweigh the \"labor habits\" cultivated under the stimulus of
money. Founder： It is not to neglect family ties， but to get more rewards in the future.
The villain： for their own interests， they would not hesitate to give up the happiness and harmony of their families to withdraw pocket money. Is it necessary to get more rewards and make use of family ties？ Even if you have money in the future， you may not be able to change the happiness of today. It is better to be a good child to share the worries and difficulties of parents. Children of the poor should shoulder the family responsibility.
The opposite side： Not relying on labor for remuneration does not mean that you do not work， but voluntary labor is different. Voluntary labor shows your concern for the family. Moreover， we need more pocket money than junior middle schools and primary schools. We are high school students. We are busy studying and have less working time， which is not equivalent at all. The opposite side： unpaid housework reflects the spirit and consciousness of service. At home， Nuo even needs to ask for compensation for something within his power. How can he talk about serving the people in society. If we can't help our parents reduce their burden by doing housework， how can we talk about helping others？ How to cultivate noble character and how
to serve the society in life and work in the future？ Service crowd？
The opposite side： labor awareness， economic awareness， family awareness and service awareness need a balance point. The \"economic consciousness\" is overemphasized while the \"family and service consciousness\" is ignored. It can be said that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Opponent： It is unwise to take it for granted to pay children. Conscious and smart parents may not think about their \"generosity\"， which not only makes children have a wrong understanding of the meaning of labor， but also makes them admire vanity and fail to establish correct life values. If habits become natural， when children grow up， they are still willing to ask for money. Aren't parents of rich businessmen able to afford it？ Opponent： Parents are very busy every day. They are already very tired for their children. Isn't it right for them to do some housework？ In addition， they can give full play to their creativity and experience real pleasure from simple labor. If a child needs to be paid by the parent to bring a bowl or chopsticks or hand a pair of socks to the parent， doesn't the relationship between the parent and the child
become a pure economic relationship？ Founder： financial awareness.
The opposite side： Not every child will have the correct concept of financial management， and parents' untimely management will also have a great impact. And if you haven't formed the good habit of correct financial management since childhood， it will also have an impact when you grow up. Besides， not every parent can afford pocket money. It depends on the economic situation of different families
Founder： We have cultivated the awareness and habit of working.
The opposite side： For children aged 5 to 13， if they link work with pocket money too early， they will subconsciously leave \"housework=pocket money\" so that children will become utilitarian； For 13-18 year olds， this will make them become economic relations， employment relations， and such labor awareness/habits with their parents， which is not conducive to the formation of values， outlook on life， and world outlook- Other remarks available to the opposing party
It depends on what kind of pocket money is given to children， so they will know the advantages and disadvantages. It is unnecessary for children who do not know what labor is and what
the meaning of money is. Such as children. It is also unnecessary for children who fully understand what labor is and what money means. Such as junior and senior high school students. 3 There are two different situations among pupils：
One is that children have formed the good habit of doing housework and loving work. The education you do is to gild the lily.
One is that children do not love work and are lazy to do housework. This method can be used to guide children to develop working habits. This process also permeated the principle education in the market economy. not overdo sth. However， in the long run， paid housework does more harm than good. Children in their teens are at a critical stage in the formation of their world outlook. Their right and wrong ideas are not very clear， and they are greatly influenced by the outside world. Sweeping the floor， cleaning the table and washing the dishes can all get pocket money， which easily leads them to form the concept of money first and doing things without money. They become money worshippers， mistaking everything in the world for a reward， thus lacking love and compassion. They don't know that doing housework is a kind of obligation， and they also sneer at voluntary work， volunteer activities and other public welfare
activities. Over time， this will make children unpopular with society.
Mother's Bill \"is a skimmed text in Volume 2 of Grade 3 of People's Education Press.\". The text is about Peter， a little boy， who writes a bill to his mother and asks for his reward for helping his mother every day； When little Peter saw the reward he wanted by his dinner plate， he also saw a bill his mother gave him. This bill made little Peter feel the selflessness and priceless of his mother's love. He was ashamed to put the reward he asked into his mother's pocket.
It is a common phenomenon that parents pay their children to do housework in the West， but please note that it is' give '！ It cannot emphasize the needs of children. Parents are active and active in educating their children. Its purpose is to cultivate children's independent consciousness and survival ability. In China， due to the influence of western traditional education concepts and market economy， the situation of Chinese children's education is more complex.
Why do we have to cultivate labor awareness by doing housework to withdraw pocket money？ Parents encourage their children to take part-time jobs in the community. Isn't it better to cultivate labor awareness to obtain labor
remuneration through knowledge？ If it only consumes personal interests and family， this small circle can only destroy the growth of young minds， and wealth can only destroy lofty ideals and good temperament.
因篇幅问题不能全部显示，请点此查看更多更全内容